Unofficial archive. This is a read-only, community-run archive of the Apple Support Community. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by Apple Inc.

How does Apple decide to deny a refund for a service that is unusable?

I purchased a 12-month NordVPN subscription through the App Store. Unfortunately, the service is extremely slow for me. Sometimes even basic websites barely load, making streaming and gaming practically unusable.


I requested a refund only a few days after purchase because the service did not work adequately for me. Apple denied the request, and my appeal was also denied with a “final” decision.


My question is: what criteria does Apple use to determine that a customer is not eligible for a refund in a situation like this?


Apple did not experience or test the poor service quality I experienced, so how can Apple determine that my case does not justify a refund without investigating whether the service actually works properly for me?


Has anyone had a similar experience? Is there any way to escalate this beyond the normal refund and appeal process?


I’m not requesting a refund because I changed my mind. I’m requesting a remedy because I paid for a service that is practically unusable for my needs.

4 replies

Apple is the middleman in this transaction. Would not Nord have to authorize a refund before Apple could issue it. Otherwise Apple would out the money, not Nord. Apple would be left holding the bag.


And if you read the small print you might notice that all sales are generally considered final in the App Store.


Sounds to me like you need to take your case to Nord and ask for a refund from them.

You might also reach out to Nord support. They may have a fix for you.

We're just users so no one here can answer your question about how or why Apple does things.

Hello~ We are your fellow forum members and can neither speak for Apple nor speculate on their policies here in this forum as it’s against terms.


~Katana-San~